What are you looking for?

What are you looking for?

SDGs: Humanity’s New Year’s Resolutions?

IISD defends the Sustainable Development Goals
IISD
Agenda 2030
Foto: Gabriella Clare Marino | Unsplash

The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) Interim Co-CEO Nathalie Bernasconi-Osterwalder and its Strategic Advisor Trine Schmidt react to the criticism that the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were too ambitious and complex.

In the IISD’s commentary “Why the SDGs are a Good Idea”, Bernasconi-Osterwalder and Schmidt reply to a piece in the Financial Times titled “Why the SDGs are a bad idea” which cast the SDGs as planet Earth’s lofty resolutions:

“The SDGs are the overarching framework of where we want to go and do not dictate which route countries should take. Unlike a New Year’s resolution, achieving the SDGs is not an individual challenge. It’s a collective endeavor. That’s good news.”

You can read the full statement online in the SDG Knowledge Hub. The hub features news and commentary regarding the implementation of the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It is managed by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD).

Author

No authors assigned to this post.

References

Related articles

“Security is more than just military strength”: Catholic Responses to Armament and Crisis

The Katholikentag in Würzburg has shown that peace, security and development go hand in hand. In this interview, Dorothee Klüppel, a member of FriEnt’s Steering Committee and Head of the Africa/Middle East Department at Misereor, explains why security is more than just military strength, why justice, democracy and international cooperation are key prerequisites for sustainable peace and what special role church actors play in this – particularly in times of rearmament and geopolitical tensions.

The Humanitarian-Development-Peace Nexus at a Turning Point

How can the Humanitarian-Development-Peace (HDP) nexus effectively deliver on its promises amid mounting crises, shrinking resources and rising political tension? Lena Pönisch, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), shares the key findings of an international reflection process and explains why, today more than ever, better political, institutional and financial frameworks are needed to achieve joint impact in crisis contexts.

From Ambition to Inaction: Climate Talks Struggle to Deliver Implementation

The intersessional climate negotiations (SB64) in Bonn concluded with sobering results. Climate justice was a central theme in many discussions and rounds of negotiations, but issues surrounding climate finance prevented an agreement from being reached. Negotiations on the global adaptation target, for example, must start again from scratch. The nexus of climate, peace and security was largely overlooked in the negotiations, as well as in the action agenda presented by the Turkish COP31 Presidency.

Building Peace in a Changing Climate: An Indigenous Perspective from Bangladesh

At the June Climate Meetings of the UNFCCC Subsidiary Bodies (SB64) in Bonn, Mrinal Kanti Tripura, Director of the Maleya Foundation in Bangladesh, shared his perspective on how climate change is affecting Indigenous Peoples in the Eastern Himalayan region. In this interview, he explains why climate impacts threaten not only livelihoods but also culture and traditional knowledge, and why Indigenous voices must be heard in climate negotiations.

Related articles