What are you looking for?

What are you looking for?

Chinese Conceptions of Peace

Historical foundations and implications for contemporary conflict agency

Peace
Security
Peace and Security
Over the past 25 years, as it has risen to the status of a great world power, China has become deeply enmeshed in attempts to manage global conflicts.

However, China’s approach to peacemaking and conflict management differs significantly from that pursued by Western states. China advocates a “developmental peace” approach that prioritizes economic development and capacity-building, arguing that development leads to peace by becoming a cause on which deeply torn societies can find common ground. This is positioned as an alternative to Western-sponsored programs in which “liberal peace” is based on political inclusion.

In this report our authors Xinyu Yuan and Pascal Abb explore the development of China’s approach to peace across traditional Chinese philosophy and modern political doctrines, showing how this intellectual history has shaped contemporary Chinese peace agency. It finds that the “developmental peace” concept is mainly influenced by two factors: China’s own experience of creating domestic stability through economic growth, and the lingering influence of Marxist thought on economic determinism.

Chinese Conceptions of Peace
Size: 614KB
File type: PDF
Authors
Pascal Abb
Pascal Abb

Peace Research Institute Frankfurt (PRIF)

Xinyu Yuan
Xinyu Yuan

Peace Research Institute Frankfurt (PRIF)

Related articles

COP31 Must Deliver for the Most Vulnerable

As COP31 approaches, Habib Ur Rehman Mayar, Deputy General Secretary of the g7+ Secretariat, argues that climate finance must finally reach conflict-affected countries. Drawing on nearly two decades of experience in aid effectiveness, fragile states and international climate policy, he outlines what an “Implementation COP” should deliver for those most vulnerable.

COP31 Must Deliver for the Most Vulnerable

As COP31 approaches, Habib Ur Rehman Mayar, Deputy General Secretary of the g7+ Secretariat, argues that climate finance must finally reach conflict-affected countries. Drawing on nearly two decades of experience in aid effectiveness, fragile states and international climate policy, he outlines what an “Implementation COP” should deliver for those most vulnerable.

“Security is more than just military strength”: Catholic Responses to Armament and Crisis

The Katholikentag in Würzburg has shown that peace, security and development go hand in hand. In this interview, Dorothee Klüppel, a member of FriEnt’s Steering Committee and Head of the Africa/Middle East Department at Misereor, explains why security is more than just military strength, why justice, democracy and international cooperation are key prerequisites for sustainable peace and what special role church actors play in this – particularly in times of rearmament and geopolitical tensions.

The Humanitarian-Development-Peace Nexus at a Turning Point

How can the Humanitarian-Development-Peace (HDP) nexus effectively deliver on its promises amid mounting crises, shrinking resources and rising political tension? Lena Pönisch, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), shares the key findings of an international reflection process and explains why, today more than ever, better political, institutional and financial frameworks are needed to achieve joint impact in crisis contexts.

From Ambition to Inaction: Climate Talks Struggle to Deliver Implementation

The intersessional climate negotiations (SB64) in Bonn concluded with sobering results. Climate justice was a central theme in many discussions and rounds of negotiations, but issues surrounding climate finance prevented an agreement from being reached. Negotiations on the global adaptation target, for example, must start again from scratch. The nexus of climate, peace and security was largely overlooked in the negotiations, as well as in the action agenda presented by the Turkish COP31 Presidency.