What are you looking for?

What are you looking for?

Reimagining digital spaces

A peacebuilder's take on disinformation
Berghof Foundation
PZKB
disinformation
peacebuilding
Peace and Security
Vanja Matijevic | Unsplash

How can peacebuilding address disinformation? Tessa Schindler explores this timely question in a blog post. She builds on a recent study which was commissioned by the Berghof Foundation as well as the Platform Peaceful Conflict Transformation (PZKB) – and enabled by a FriEnt grant.

“How can we build a digital future that promotes truth and understanding instead of division and harm?“

The Berghof Foundation, in collaboration with the Platform Peaceful Conflict Transformation, recently commissioned a study on Peacebuilding and disinformation that tries to answer this question; it focuses on how peacebuilding can address disinformation. More than just false or misleading information, disinformation is defined as information shared with the intent to harm. Therefore, focusing on technology is not enough to address the issue. An effective response must also consider the human drivers behind disinformation and unite various disciplines.

In her blog post, Tessa Schindler also challenges us to move beyond reactionary measures (such as attempts to modify existing platforms). Moreover, we should try to imagine a digital future with platforms that promote transparency and understanding – working towards long-term strategies that promote a more informed and cohesive society. “As digital spaces become increasingly influenced by disinformation, peacebuilders play a crucial role in shaping a more informed online (and offline) world,“ she argues.

Author

No authors assigned to this post.

References

Related articles

“Security is more than just military strength”: Catholic Responses to Armament and Crisis

The Katholikentag in Würzburg has shown that peace, security and development go hand in hand. In this interview, Dorothee Klüppel, a member of FriEnt’s Steering Committee and Head of the Africa/Middle East Department at Misereor, explains why security is more than just military strength, why justice, democracy and international cooperation are key prerequisites for sustainable peace and what special role church actors play in this – particularly in times of rearmament and geopolitical tensions.

The Humanitarian-Development-Peace Nexus at a Turning Point

How can the Humanitarian-Development-Peace (HDP) nexus effectively deliver on its promises amid mounting crises, shrinking resources and rising political tension? Lena Pönisch, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), shares the key findings of an international reflection process and explains why, today more than ever, better political, institutional and financial frameworks are needed to achieve joint impact in crisis contexts.

From Ambition to Inaction: Climate Talks Struggle to Deliver Implementation

The intersessional climate negotiations (SB64) in Bonn concluded with sobering results. Climate justice was a central theme in many discussions and rounds of negotiations, but issues surrounding climate finance prevented an agreement from being reached. Negotiations on the global adaptation target, for example, must start again from scratch. The nexus of climate, peace and security was largely overlooked in the negotiations, as well as in the action agenda presented by the Turkish COP31 Presidency.

Building Peace in a Changing Climate: An Indigenous Perspective from Bangladesh

At the June Climate Meetings of the UNFCCC Subsidiary Bodies (SB64) in Bonn, Mrinal Kanti Tripura, Director of the Maleya Foundation in Bangladesh, shared his perspective on how climate change is affecting Indigenous Peoples in the Eastern Himalayan region. In this interview, he explains why climate impacts threaten not only livelihoods but also culture and traditional knowledge, and why Indigenous voices must be heard in climate negotiations.

Related articles