What are you looking for?

News

Reimagining digital spaces

A peacebuilder's take on disinformation
Vanja Matijevic | Unsplash

How can peacebuilding address disinformation? Tessa Schindler explores this timely question in a blog post. She builds on a recent study which was commissioned by the Berghof Foundation as well as the Platform Peaceful Conflict Transformation (PZKB) – and enabled by a FriEnt grant.

“How can we build a digital future that promotes truth and understanding instead of division and harm?“

The Berghof Foundation, in collaboration with the Platform Peaceful Conflict Transformation, recently commissioned a study on Peacebuilding and disinformation that tries to answer this question; it focuses on how peacebuilding can address disinformation. More than just false or misleading information, disinformation is defined as information shared with the intent to harm. Therefore, focusing on technology is not enough to address the issue. An effective response must also consider the human drivers behind disinformation and unite various disciplines.

In her blog post, Tessa Schindler also challenges us to move beyond reactionary measures (such as attempts to modify existing platforms). Moreover, we should try to imagine a digital future with platforms that promote transparency and understanding – working towards long-term strategies that promote a more informed and cohesive society. “As digital spaces become increasingly influenced by disinformation, peacebuilders play a crucial role in shaping a more informed online (and offline) world,“ she argues.

References
Share
Author
Get in touch
Do you have questions about this article, or would you like to contact the FriEnt team?

Related articles

[tag_names_card]

“A conflict is not forgotten, because the headlines move on”

At FriEnt’s latest Forgotten Conflicts series discussion, held on 26 August in Berlin, experts and practitioners from Nigeria and Germany explored the drivers and consequences of violence in the country’s Northwest and Middle Belt. The discussion challenged narratives that portray the violence primarily as a religious conflict and highlighted the need to address climate stress, land scarcity, governance gaps and the erosion of livelihoods, while strengthening locally rooted approaches to peacebuilding.
[tag_names_card]

“Security is more than just military strength”: Catholic Responses to Armament and Crisis

The Katholikentag in Würzburg has shown that peace, security and development go hand in hand. In this interview, Dorothee Klüppel, a member of FriEnt’s Steering Committee and Head of the Africa/Middle East Department at Misereor, explains why security is more than just military strength, why justice, democracy and international cooperation are key prerequisites for sustainable peace and what special role church actors play in this – particularly in times of rearmament and geopolitical tensions.
[tag_names_card]

The Humanitarian-Development-Peace Nexus at a Turning Point

How can the Humanitarian-Development-Peace (HDP) nexus effectively deliver on its promises amid mounting crises, shrinking resources and rising political tension? Lena Pönisch, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), shares the key findings of an international reflection process and explains why, today more than ever, better political, institutional and financial frameworks are needed to achieve joint impact in crisis contexts.
[tag_names_card]

From Ambition to Inaction: Climate Talks Struggle to Deliver Implementation

The intersessional climate negotiations (SB64) in Bonn concluded with sobering results. Climate justice was a central theme in many discussions and rounds of negotiations, but issues surrounding climate finance prevented an agreement from being reached. Negotiations on the global adaptation target, for example, must start again from scratch. The nexus of climate, peace and security was largely overlooked in the negotiations, as well as in the action agenda presented by the Turkish COP31 Presidency.

Related articles