What are you looking for?

News

Property rights don’t recover themselves

New study on the challenges and opportunities in the property restitution process after the second Karabakh War
Shushi | Sarin Aventisian | Unsplash

Restitution of housing and property related to forced displacement is at the core of many political debates on transitional justice. Does transitional justice provide a sufficient basis for understanding how to best respond to property claims following military conflict? And what kind of assistance programs are applied in an unrecognized state experiencing wartime? Eviya Hovhannisyan and Nika Musavi address these questions in the context of the Second Karabakh War.

The study by Eviya Hovhannisyan and Nika Musavi addresses the socio-legal aspects of property restitution after the Second Karabakh War. They explore the existence and content of the right to property restitution through the lens of transitional justice. Beyond that, specific problems in the institutional and bureaucratic spheres as well as the application of property restitution in practice is examined.

A wide range of questions is being explored: Does transitional justice provide a sufficient basis for understanding how to best respond to property claims following military conflict? Does a rights-based legal framework used in transitional justice provide adequate reparations for property damage in different socio-cultural and historical trajectories? What kind of reparation/assistance programs for lost property are applied in an unrecognized state experiencing wartime?

The authors outline the different situations of Armenian and Azerbaijani citizens: Azerbaijanis have mostly settled in other cities after the first Karabakh War, making a hypothetic return to their “historic homeland” an opportunity rather than a pressing need. Armenian authorities in Karabakh, instead, are unwilling to fulfil their responsibility of protecting the local Armenian population and often unable to resolve issues of assistance and compensation for lost property. At the same time, Azerbaijani authorities question the very possibility of the return of the Armenian population to the territory.

As long as Karabakh’s status is unresolved there will not be a real solution to the problem. Thus, many people are linking their future to a territory with no real guarantees that all may be lost again.

The complete study was published in the Caucasus Edition of the Journal of Conflict Transformation.

References
Share
Author
Get in touch
Do you have questions about this article, or would you like to contact the FriEnt team?

Related articles

[tag_names_card]

New FriEnt Website: Peace and development at a glance

The Working Group on Peace and Development (FriEnt) has completely revamped its website. With a clear thematic structure, simplified navigation and a modern, accessible design, the network’s work is now even more visible and easier to explore – for experts and anyone interested in peace and development alike. As before, the website is available in both German and English.
[tag_names_card]

New to the FriEnt team: Peer Krumrey

Since September 2026, Peer Krumrey has been part of the FriEnt team. He joins FriEnt on secondment from the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES), where he works as a programme officer for peace and security in the Division for International Cooperation, Global and European Policy. At FriEnt, he focuses in particular on peace and security as well as peace and development.
[tag_names_card]

“A conflict is not forgotten, because the headlines move on”

At FriEnt’s latest Forgotten Conflicts series discussion, held on 26 August in Berlin, experts and practitioners from Nigeria and Germany explored the drivers and consequences of violence in the country’s Northwest and Middle Belt. The discussion challenged narratives that portray the violence primarily as a religious conflict and highlighted the need to address climate stress, land scarcity, governance gaps and the erosion of livelihoods, while strengthening locally rooted approaches to peacebuilding.
[tag_names_card]

“Security is more than just military strength”: Catholic Responses to Armament and Crisis

The Katholikentag in Würzburg has shown that peace, security and development go hand in hand. In this interview, Dorothee Klüppel, a member of FriEnt’s Steering Committee and Head of the Africa/Middle East Department at Misereor, explains why security is more than just military strength, why justice, democracy and international cooperation are key prerequisites for sustainable peace and what special role church actors play in this – particularly in times of rearmament and geopolitical tensions.

Related articles