What are you looking for?

What are you looking for?

Property rights don’t recover themselves

New study on the challenges and opportunities in the property restitution process after the second Karabakh War
Transitional Justice (TJ)
Shushi | Sarin Aventisian | Unsplash

Restitution of housing and property related to forced displacement is at the core of many political debates on transitional justice. Does transitional justice provide a sufficient basis for understanding how to best respond to property claims following military conflict? And what kind of assistance programs are applied in an unrecognized state experiencing wartime? Eviya Hovhannisyan and Nika Musavi address these questions in the context of the Second Karabakh War.

The study by Eviya Hovhannisyan and Nika Musavi addresses the socio-legal aspects of property restitution after the Second Karabakh War. They explore the existence and content of the right to property restitution through the lens of transitional justice. Beyond that, specific problems in the institutional and bureaucratic spheres as well as the application of property restitution in practice is examined.

A wide range of questions is being explored: Does transitional justice provide a sufficient basis for understanding how to best respond to property claims following military conflict? Does a rights-based legal framework used in transitional justice provide adequate reparations for property damage in different socio-cultural and historical trajectories? What kind of reparation/assistance programs for lost property are applied in an unrecognized state experiencing wartime?

The authors outline the different situations of Armenian and Azerbaijani citizens: Azerbaijanis have mostly settled in other cities after the first Karabakh War, making a hypothetic return to their “historic homeland” an opportunity rather than a pressing need. Armenian authorities in Karabakh, instead, are unwilling to fulfil their responsibility of protecting the local Armenian population and often unable to resolve issues of assistance and compensation for lost property. At the same time, Azerbaijani authorities question the very possibility of the return of the Armenian population to the territory.

As long as Karabakh’s status is unresolved there will not be a real solution to the problem. Thus, many people are linking their future to a territory with no real guarantees that all may be lost again.

The complete study was published in the Caucasus Edition of the Journal of Conflict Transformation.

Contact

No authors assigned to this post.

References

Related articles

Peace needs a vision: FriEnt provides impulses for the implementation of the BMZ reform

With a recent position paper, the Working Group on Peace and Development (FriEnt) is bringing perspectives on peace and development policy into the debate on the reform of German development cooperation. The paper “Recommendations for the Implementation of the BMZ Reform in Peacebuilding and Development Policy” highlights how conflict sensitivity, local ownership and civilian peacebuilding can be enshrined as key guiding principles in the implementation of the BMZ reform agenda “Shaping the future together globally”.

Mona Hein joins FriEnt team with a focus on feminist peacebuilding

As of June 1, Mona Hein has joined the FriEnt team as a seconded staff member from the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ). Her work focuses on feminist peacebuilding as well as on linking different disciplinary perspectives in international peace work.
FriEnt Peacebuilding Forum

FriEnt Peacebuilding Forum 2026: The Focus on the Future of Peacebuilding 

At a time of growing global instability and a renewed focus on security and deterrence, the FriEnt Peacebuilding Forum 2026 offers a clear counterpoint by bringing together around 150 international experts and practitioners to identify and advance new pathways towards sustainable and just peace.
CSP
Global Partnerships

„Wo Zivilgesellschaft geschwächt wird, wachsen Autoritarismus und Gewalt“

Zivilgesellschaftliche Räume schrumpfen weltweit – mit Folgen für Frieden, Demokratie und globale Gerechtigkeit. Ralph Ellermann von Conducive Space for Peace (CSP) erklärt im Interview, warum dieser Trend kein Zufall ist, weshalb echte Freiheit nur kollektiv entstehen kann und wie eine translokale Zivilgesellschaft neue Handlungsspielräume eröffnet.

Related articles