What are you looking for?

What are you looking for?

Property rights don’t recover themselves

New study on the challenges and opportunities in the property restitution process after the second Karabakh War
Transitional Justice (TJ)
Shushi | Sarin Aventisian | Unsplash

Restitution of housing and property related to forced displacement is at the core of many political debates on transitional justice. Does transitional justice provide a sufficient basis for understanding how to best respond to property claims following military conflict? And what kind of assistance programs are applied in an unrecognized state experiencing wartime? Eviya Hovhannisyan and Nika Musavi address these questions in the context of the Second Karabakh War.

The study by Eviya Hovhannisyan and Nika Musavi addresses the socio-legal aspects of property restitution after the Second Karabakh War. They explore the existence and content of the right to property restitution through the lens of transitional justice. Beyond that, specific problems in the institutional and bureaucratic spheres as well as the application of property restitution in practice is examined.

A wide range of questions is being explored: Does transitional justice provide a sufficient basis for understanding how to best respond to property claims following military conflict? Does a rights-based legal framework used in transitional justice provide adequate reparations for property damage in different socio-cultural and historical trajectories? What kind of reparation/assistance programs for lost property are applied in an unrecognized state experiencing wartime?

The authors outline the different situations of Armenian and Azerbaijani citizens: Azerbaijanis have mostly settled in other cities after the first Karabakh War, making a hypothetic return to their “historic homeland” an opportunity rather than a pressing need. Armenian authorities in Karabakh, instead, are unwilling to fulfil their responsibility of protecting the local Armenian population and often unable to resolve issues of assistance and compensation for lost property. At the same time, Azerbaijani authorities question the very possibility of the return of the Armenian population to the territory.

As long as Karabakh’s status is unresolved there will not be a real solution to the problem. Thus, many people are linking their future to a territory with no real guarantees that all may be lost again.

The complete study was published in the Caucasus Edition of the Journal of Conflict Transformation.

Author

No authors assigned to this post.

References

Related articles

“Security is more than just military strength”: Catholic Responses to Armament and Crisis

The Katholikentag in Würzburg has shown that peace, security and development go hand in hand. In this interview, Dorothee Klüppel, a member of FriEnt’s Steering Committee and Head of the Africa/Middle East Department at Misereor, explains why security is more than just military strength, why justice, democracy and international cooperation are key prerequisites for sustainable peace and what special role church actors play in this – particularly in times of rearmament and geopolitical tensions.

The Humanitarian-Development-Peace Nexus at a Turning Point

How can the Humanitarian-Development-Peace (HDP) nexus effectively deliver on its promises amid mounting crises, shrinking resources and rising political tension? Lena Pönisch, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), shares the key findings of an international reflection process and explains why, today more than ever, better political, institutional and financial frameworks are needed to achieve joint impact in crisis contexts.

From Ambition to Inaction: Climate Talks Struggle to Deliver Implementation

The intersessional climate negotiations (SB64) in Bonn concluded with sobering results. Climate justice was a central theme in many discussions and rounds of negotiations, but issues surrounding climate finance prevented an agreement from being reached. Negotiations on the global adaptation target, for example, must start again from scratch. The nexus of climate, peace and security was largely overlooked in the negotiations, as well as in the action agenda presented by the Turkish COP31 Presidency.

Building Peace in a Changing Climate: An Indigenous Perspective from Bangladesh

At the June Climate Meetings of the UNFCCC Subsidiary Bodies (SB64) in Bonn, Mrinal Kanti Tripura, Director of the Maleya Foundation in Bangladesh, shared his perspective on how climate change is affecting Indigenous Peoples in the Eastern Himalayan region. In this interview, he explains why climate impacts threaten not only livelihoods but also culture and traditional knowledge, and why Indigenous voices must be heard in climate negotiations.

Related articles