What are you looking for?

What are you looking for?

Strong consensus on mutual partnerships and political will

The FriEnt Peacebuilding Forum 2021 Documentation is now available
FriEnt
Global Partnerships
Control Room I FriEnt Peacebuilding Forum 2021

The very first virtual FriEnt Peacebuilding Forum 2021 “Translate-Relate-Act: Forging Partnerships for Sustainable Peace” was held in April and May. The essence of the 26 virtual sessions and 3 plenary sessions was captured in the documentation of the 5-day event and can now be revisited on the FriEnt Peacebuilding Forum Website.

120 speakers and moderators enriched the virtual sessions with their expert knowledge and field experience on topics ranging from digitalisation and climate change to Covid-19, radicalisation and transitional justice. The themes were characterized by high diversity – and yet the exchanges remained closely intertwined by a mutual will to connect, accelerate change and reach progress on the ground.

Current trends, challenges and opportunities in the peacebuilding field were thus extensively covered and innovative approaches presented and discussed. The documentation entails integral guiding questions, key theses, thoughts and ideas as well as insightful quotes of each session to gain a comprehensive understanding of the individual importance to peacebuilding.

The urgent need for mutual and cross-sectoral partnerships

Building on the prior exchange during the virtual sessions, the three plenary sessions took up many of the discussed issues and tackled some of the overarching questions for the future of peacebuilding. How can we establish equal and meaningful partnerships which serve the interests of all involved and affected by conflict and peacebuilding? And how can cross-sectoral approaches contribute to peacebuilding and resilient societies and what should be done by policy makers and practitioners to promote comprehensive approaches for peace and development?

The panelists emphasised the urgent need for partnerships of mutuality in which the agendas are set by a broad group of actors (multi-stakeholder approach) and the participation of youth and civil society is strengthened. One of the most important reasons for the failure of peace processes tends to be their exclusive character. Inclusive partnerships are therefore key to the resolution of prevailing imbalances in financial possibilities, political resources, technological knowledge and peace infrastructures. Peacebuilding is no stand-alone domain and the panellists defined cross-sectoral linkages as essential to an increased impact, improved prospects for peace and a more inclusive outreach.

In addition to the close agreement across the three panels that inclusive policies and mutual partnerships are needed in the peacebuilding architecture, the missing political will was jointly defined as a major obstacle. Whether the political economy is oriented towards peace is central to the issue of inclusion, mutual partnerships and remaining structural inequalities. The documentation therefore entails relevant policy recommendations as well as the key takeaways of the three panels.

Find more insights to the FriEnt Peacebuilding Forum 2021 here.

Author

No authors assigned to this post.

References

Related articles

“Security is more than just military strength”: Catholic Responses to Armament and Crisis

The Katholikentag in Würzburg has shown that peace, security and development go hand in hand. In this interview, Dorothee Klüppel, a member of FriEnt’s Steering Committee and Head of the Africa/Middle East Department at Misereor, explains why security is more than just military strength, why justice, democracy and international cooperation are key prerequisites for sustainable peace and what special role church actors play in this – particularly in times of rearmament and geopolitical tensions.

The Humanitarian-Development-Peace Nexus at a Turning Point

How can the Humanitarian-Development-Peace (HDP) nexus effectively deliver on its promises amid mounting crises, shrinking resources and rising political tension? Lena Pönisch, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), shares the key findings of an international reflection process and explains why, today more than ever, better political, institutional and financial frameworks are needed to achieve joint impact in crisis contexts.

From Ambition to Inaction: Climate Talks Struggle to Deliver Implementation

The intersessional climate negotiations (SB64) in Bonn concluded with sobering results. Climate justice was a central theme in many discussions and rounds of negotiations, but issues surrounding climate finance prevented an agreement from being reached. Negotiations on the global adaptation target, for example, must start again from scratch. The nexus of climate, peace and security was largely overlooked in the negotiations, as well as in the action agenda presented by the Turkish COP31 Presidency.

Building Peace in a Changing Climate: An Indigenous Perspective from Bangladesh

At the June Climate Meetings of the UNFCCC Subsidiary Bodies (SB64) in Bonn, Mrinal Kanti Tripura, Director of the Maleya Foundation in Bangladesh, shared his perspective on how climate change is affecting Indigenous Peoples in the Eastern Himalayan region. In this interview, he explains why climate impacts threaten not only livelihoods but also culture and traditional knowledge, and why Indigenous voices must be heard in climate negotiations.

Related articles