What are you looking for?

What are you looking for?

Mehr als 30 Jahre Nagorny Karabah Konflikt

Aktualisiertes Working Dokument des Centre for European Policy Studies
CEPS
Ruinen des aserbaidschanischen Teils von Shusha, Bergkarabach, nach dem Krieg 1992. Foto: Yuzu2020 | iStock.

Der Bergkarabach Konflikt zwischen Armenien und Aserbaidschan bleibt auch nach mehr als 30 Jahren der gefährlichste Konflikt in der post-sowjetischen Zeit. In diesem Working Document befindet sich das grundsätzlich überarbeitete Kapitel 7 der in Kürze erscheinenden zweiten Auflage des Buches “Beyond Frozen Conflict: Scenarios for the Separatist Disputes of Eastern Europe” von Thomas de Waal und Nikolaus von Twickel, herausgegeben von Michael Emerson.

Aserbaidschan hat nach den Verlusten von Anfang der 1990er Jahre im letzten Jahr die armenische Seite besiegt und gedemütigt zurückgelassen. Zum ersten Mal hat sich Russland mitten in die Konfliktzone begeben, indem es eine Friedenstruppe nach Karabach geschickt habt. Ein endgültiges armenisch-aserbaidschanisches Friedensabkommen müsste den Status von Bergkarabach regeln, um die Beziehungen zwischen Baku und Eriwan zu befrieden. Aber dies scheint nach wie vor in weiter Ferne zu liegen.

Author

No authors assigned to this post.

References

The Nagorny Karabah Conflict in its Fourth Decade

The Nagorny Karabah Conflict in its Fourth Decade

Related articles

“Security is more than just military strength”: Catholic Responses to Armament and Crisis

The Katholikentag in Würzburg has shown that peace, security and development go hand in hand. In this interview, Dorothee Klüppel, a member of FriEnt’s Steering Committee and Head of the Africa/Middle East Department at Misereor, explains why security is more than just military strength, why justice, democracy and international cooperation are key prerequisites for sustainable peace and what special role church actors play in this – particularly in times of rearmament and geopolitical tensions.

The Humanitarian-Development-Peace Nexus at a Turning Point

How can the Humanitarian-Development-Peace (HDP) nexus effectively deliver on its promises amid mounting crises, shrinking resources and rising political tension? Lena Pönisch, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), shares the key findings of an international reflection process and explains why, today more than ever, better political, institutional and financial frameworks are needed to achieve joint impact in crisis contexts.

From Ambition to Inaction: Climate Talks Struggle to Deliver Implementation

The intersessional climate negotiations (SB64) in Bonn concluded with sobering results. Climate justice was a central theme in many discussions and rounds of negotiations, but issues surrounding climate finance prevented an agreement from being reached. Negotiations on the global adaptation target, for example, must start again from scratch. The nexus of climate, peace and security was largely overlooked in the negotiations, as well as in the action agenda presented by the Turkish COP31 Presidency.

Building Peace in a Changing Climate: An Indigenous Perspective from Bangladesh

At the June Climate Meetings of the UNFCCC Subsidiary Bodies (SB64) in Bonn, Mrinal Kanti Tripura, Director of the Maleya Foundation in Bangladesh, shared his perspective on how climate change is affecting Indigenous Peoples in the Eastern Himalayan region. In this interview, he explains why climate impacts threaten not only livelihoods but also culture and traditional knowledge, and why Indigenous voices must be heard in climate negotiations.

Related articles