What are you looking for?

News

Mehr als 30 Jahre Nagorny Karabah Konflikt

Aktualisiertes Working Dokument des Centre for European Policy Studies
Ruinen des aserbaidschanischen Teils von Shusha, Bergkarabach, nach dem Krieg 1992. Foto: Yuzu2020 | iStock.

Der Bergkarabach Konflikt zwischen Armenien und Aserbaidschan bleibt auch nach mehr als 30 Jahren der gefährlichste Konflikt in der post-sowjetischen Zeit. In diesem Working Document befindet sich das grundsätzlich überarbeitete Kapitel 7 der in Kürze erscheinenden zweiten Auflage des Buches “Beyond Frozen Conflict: Scenarios for the Separatist Disputes of Eastern Europe” von Thomas de Waal und Nikolaus von Twickel, herausgegeben von Michael Emerson.

Aserbaidschan hat nach den Verlusten von Anfang der 1990er Jahre im letzten Jahr die armenische Seite besiegt und gedemütigt zurückgelassen. Zum ersten Mal hat sich Russland mitten in die Konfliktzone begeben, indem es eine Friedenstruppe nach Karabach geschickt habt. Ein endgültiges armenisch-aserbaidschanisches Friedensabkommen müsste den Status von Bergkarabach regeln, um die Beziehungen zwischen Baku und Eriwan zu befrieden. Aber dies scheint nach wie vor in weiter Ferne zu liegen.

References

The Nagorny Karabah Conflict in its Fourth Decade

The Nagorny Karabah Conflict in its Fourth Decade

Share
Author
Get in touch
Do you have questions about this article, or would you like to contact the FriEnt team?

Related articles

[tag_names_card]

“A conflict is not forgotten, because the headlines move on”

At FriEnt’s latest Forgotten Conflicts series discussion, held on 26 August in Berlin, experts and practitioners from Nigeria and Germany explored the drivers and consequences of violence in the country’s Northwest and Middle Belt. The discussion challenged narratives that portray the violence primarily as a religious conflict and highlighted the need to address climate stress, land scarcity, governance gaps and the erosion of livelihoods, while strengthening locally rooted approaches to peacebuilding.
[tag_names_card]

“Security is more than just military strength”: Catholic Responses to Armament and Crisis

The Katholikentag in Würzburg has shown that peace, security and development go hand in hand. In this interview, Dorothee Klüppel, a member of FriEnt’s Steering Committee and Head of the Africa/Middle East Department at Misereor, explains why security is more than just military strength, why justice, democracy and international cooperation are key prerequisites for sustainable peace and what special role church actors play in this – particularly in times of rearmament and geopolitical tensions.
[tag_names_card]

The Humanitarian-Development-Peace Nexus at a Turning Point

How can the Humanitarian-Development-Peace (HDP) nexus effectively deliver on its promises amid mounting crises, shrinking resources and rising political tension? Lena Pönisch, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), shares the key findings of an international reflection process and explains why, today more than ever, better political, institutional and financial frameworks are needed to achieve joint impact in crisis contexts.
[tag_names_card]

From Ambition to Inaction: Climate Talks Struggle to Deliver Implementation

The intersessional climate negotiations (SB64) in Bonn concluded with sobering results. Climate justice was a central theme in many discussions and rounds of negotiations, but issues surrounding climate finance prevented an agreement from being reached. Negotiations on the global adaptation target, for example, must start again from scratch. The nexus of climate, peace and security was largely overlooked in the negotiations, as well as in the action agenda presented by the Turkish COP31 Presidency.

Related articles