What are you looking for?

What are you looking for?

Feminist Foreign Policy Progressive Voices Collective

An initiative by Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung and the Foundation for European Progressive Studies
FES
civil society
decolonisation
Gender
Feminist Peacebuilding
Graphic: FEPS / FES

How can we use an intersectional feminist way of thinking to shape our foreign policies? Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung and the Foundation for European Progressive Studies (FEPS) launched the Feminist Foreign Policy Progressive Voices Collective to develop concrete proposals for the EU and national level.

Feminist Foreign Policy (FFP) provides a powerful tool to question traditional approaches to foreign policy, which often reinforce patriarchal, post-colonial systems. FFP’s value-based approach shows that there is an alternative way – grounded in an intersectional feminist way of thinking and transformative strategies to tackle structural inequalities within societies and on a global level.

More and more countries, especially in Europe and Latin America, have announced their own feminist foreign policies in recent years. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung and FEPS took this development as an opportunity to launch the FFP Progressive Voices Collective (FFPPVC) in 2023. The Collective – co-chaired by Ann Linde, former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, and Machris Cabreros, Global Coordinator of the Progressive Alliance, – gathers experts from policymaking, academia, and civil society from around the world. It aims to facilitate debates and to develop concrete policy proposals on how to implement a feminist foreign policy.

The FFP policy brief series “Feminist Foreign Policy in Action” provides recommendations on core FFP topics such as feminist funding as well as a feminist perspective on security and defence. You can find the series on the website of Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung here.

Author

No authors assigned to this post.

References

Related articles

“Security is more than just military strength”: Catholic Responses to Armament and Crisis

The Katholikentag in Würzburg has shown that peace, security and development go hand in hand. In this interview, Dorothee Klüppel, a member of FriEnt’s Steering Committee and Head of the Africa/Middle East Department at Misereor, explains why security is more than just military strength, why justice, democracy and international cooperation are key prerequisites for sustainable peace and what special role church actors play in this – particularly in times of rearmament and geopolitical tensions.

The Humanitarian-Development-Peace Nexus at a Turning Point

How can the Humanitarian-Development-Peace (HDP) nexus effectively deliver on its promises amid mounting crises, shrinking resources and rising political tension? Lena Pönisch, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), shares the key findings of an international reflection process and explains why, today more than ever, better political, institutional and financial frameworks are needed to achieve joint impact in crisis contexts.

From Ambition to Inaction: Climate Talks Struggle to Deliver Implementation

The intersessional climate negotiations (SB64) in Bonn concluded with sobering results. Climate justice was a central theme in many discussions and rounds of negotiations, but issues surrounding climate finance prevented an agreement from being reached. Negotiations on the global adaptation target, for example, must start again from scratch. The nexus of climate, peace and security was largely overlooked in the negotiations, as well as in the action agenda presented by the Turkish COP31 Presidency.

Building Peace in a Changing Climate: An Indigenous Perspective from Bangladesh

At the June Climate Meetings of the UNFCCC Subsidiary Bodies (SB64) in Bonn, Mrinal Kanti Tripura, Director of the Maleya Foundation in Bangladesh, shared his perspective on how climate change is affecting Indigenous Peoples in the Eastern Himalayan region. In this interview, he explains why climate impacts threaten not only livelihoods but also culture and traditional knowledge, and why Indigenous voices must be heard in climate negotiations.

Related articles