What are you looking for?

News

Gefangen in der Eskalationsspirale

Abschreckung soll den Gegner zu Zurückhaltung bewegen – kann aber als Aggression wahrgenommen werden. Gibt es einen Ausweg aus dem Dilemma?
Robin Schreiner | Unsplash

Das Konstrukt der Abschreckung soll Eskalationen verhindern. In der Realität kann es jedoch leicht passieren, dass das Gegenteil geschieht und ein Konflikt eskaliert. In seinem Beitrag im Journal für Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft setzt sich Johann Ivanov, Entsandter der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung bei FriEnt, mit diesem Dilemma auseinander.

Am Beispiel der Konfrontation zwischen der NATO und Russland erläutert er, wie Abschreckungsmaßnahmen schlimmstenfalls einen entgegengesetzten Effekt erzielen könnten. Er plädiert dafür, in der sich zunehmend verschärfenden sicherheitspolitischen Lage keine vorschnellen Entscheidungen zu treffen. Die Komplexität der Lage sowie kurzfristige und langfristige Entwicklungen müssten ausreichend reflektiert werden.

References

Gefangen in der Eskalationsspirale

Journal für Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft, 28.11.2024

Share
Author
Get in touch
Do you have questions about this article, or would you like to contact the FriEnt team?

Related articles

[tag_names_card]

“A conflict is not forgotten, because the headlines move on”

At FriEnt’s latest Forgotten Conflicts series discussion, held on 26 August in Berlin, experts and practitioners from Nigeria and Germany explored the drivers and consequences of violence in the country’s Northwest and Middle Belt. The discussion challenged narratives that portray the violence primarily as a religious conflict and highlighted the need to address climate stress, land scarcity, governance gaps and the erosion of livelihoods, while strengthening locally rooted approaches to peacebuilding.
[tag_names_card]

“Security is more than just military strength”: Catholic Responses to Armament and Crisis

The Katholikentag in Würzburg has shown that peace, security and development go hand in hand. In this interview, Dorothee Klüppel, a member of FriEnt’s Steering Committee and Head of the Africa/Middle East Department at Misereor, explains why security is more than just military strength, why justice, democracy and international cooperation are key prerequisites for sustainable peace and what special role church actors play in this – particularly in times of rearmament and geopolitical tensions.
[tag_names_card]

The Humanitarian-Development-Peace Nexus at a Turning Point

How can the Humanitarian-Development-Peace (HDP) nexus effectively deliver on its promises amid mounting crises, shrinking resources and rising political tension? Lena Pönisch, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), shares the key findings of an international reflection process and explains why, today more than ever, better political, institutional and financial frameworks are needed to achieve joint impact in crisis contexts.
[tag_names_card]

From Ambition to Inaction: Climate Talks Struggle to Deliver Implementation

The intersessional climate negotiations (SB64) in Bonn concluded with sobering results. Climate justice was a central theme in many discussions and rounds of negotiations, but issues surrounding climate finance prevented an agreement from being reached. Negotiations on the global adaptation target, for example, must start again from scratch. The nexus of climate, peace and security was largely overlooked in the negotiations, as well as in the action agenda presented by the Turkish COP31 Presidency.

Related articles