What are you looking for?

What are you looking for?

Global Militarisation Index

Naher und mittlerer Osten dominieren das Ranking
BICC
Peace and Security

Das BICC (Bonn International Center for Conversion) hat seinen diesjährigen Global Militarisation Index (GMI) veröffentlicht. Jedes Jahr listet das BICC den Status der Militarisierung der Länder auf.

Das BICC (Bonn International Center for Conversion) hat seinen diesjährigen Global Militarisation Index (GMI) veröffentlicht. Jedes Jahr listet das BICC den Status der Militarisierung der Länder auf. Der GMI 2020 deckt 151 Staaten ab und basiert auf den neuesten verfügbaren Daten. Das Indexprojekt wird finanziell unterstützt durch das BMZ.

Das diesjährige GMI-Ranking führt zehn Länder an, die im Verhältnis zu anderen gesellschaftlichen Bereichen besonders große Ressourcen für das Militär aufwenden: Israel, Armenien, Oman, Bahrain, Singapur, Saudi-Arabien, Brunei, Russland, Kuwait und Jordanien. Im COVID-19-Jahr befasst sich das GMI 2020 auch mit einem Vergleich zwischen Militarisierungsgrad und Gesundheitssicherheit (Global Health Security). Länder mit einem durchschnittlichen Militarisierungsgrad schneiden im Gesundheitswesen am besten ab.

Der BICC Globale Militarisierungsindex von 2020 kann hier heruntergeladen werden.

Author

No authors assigned to this post.

References

Related articles

“Security is more than just military strength”: Catholic Responses to Armament and Crisis

The Katholikentag in Würzburg has shown that peace, security and development go hand in hand. In this interview, Dorothee Klüppel, a member of FriEnt’s Steering Committee and Head of the Africa/Middle East Department at Misereor, explains why security is more than just military strength, why justice, democracy and international cooperation are key prerequisites for sustainable peace and what special role church actors play in this – particularly in times of rearmament and geopolitical tensions.

The Humanitarian-Development-Peace Nexus at a Turning Point

How can the Humanitarian-Development-Peace (HDP) nexus effectively deliver on its promises amid mounting crises, shrinking resources and rising political tension? Lena Pönisch, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), shares the key findings of an international reflection process and explains why, today more than ever, better political, institutional and financial frameworks are needed to achieve joint impact in crisis contexts.

From Ambition to Inaction: Climate Talks Struggle to Deliver Implementation

The intersessional climate negotiations (SB64) in Bonn concluded with sobering results. Climate justice was a central theme in many discussions and rounds of negotiations, but issues surrounding climate finance prevented an agreement from being reached. Negotiations on the global adaptation target, for example, must start again from scratch. The nexus of climate, peace and security was largely overlooked in the negotiations, as well as in the action agenda presented by the Turkish COP31 Presidency.

Building Peace in a Changing Climate: An Indigenous Perspective from Bangladesh

At the June Climate Meetings of the UNFCCC Subsidiary Bodies (SB64) in Bonn, Mrinal Kanti Tripura, Director of the Maleya Foundation in Bangladesh, shared his perspective on how climate change is affecting Indigenous Peoples in the Eastern Himalayan region. In this interview, he explains why climate impacts threaten not only livelihoods but also culture and traditional knowledge, and why Indigenous voices must be heard in climate negotiations.

Related articles