What are you looking for?

What are you looking for?

How to prevent escalation

Online panel discussion on 3 March: Panel discussion with activists and experts on nonviolent resistance
Berghof Foundation
prevention
Oposition rally aginst violence in Venezuela | andresAzp

Join the online panel on peaceful protest movements and the challenges of nonviolent resistance.

As witnessed across Latin America, the Middle East and North Africa region, Asia, Africa and Europe during the last decade, there is a global resurgence of nonviolent movements taking to the streets to protest against autocratic or unaccountable governments, often aspiring for regime change, state reform or the reallocation of political power. However, protest movements often fail to meet their ambitious aspirations and to keep a nonviolent discipline when faced with brutal state repression and international inaction. The reasons why some peaceful movements are able to maintain their campaigns nonviolent while others are not, are manifold, and a phenomenon that has only been partly understood and analysed. Similarly, what the international community can do to support peaceful protest movements is still a conundrum. Often, they stood by while protesters pleaded for support and peaceful protests turned violent as a last resort.

This event seeks to find answers to how peacebuilding actors can assist peaceful movements in maintaining a nonviolent discipline while mobilising against structural, cultural and physical violence. Together we will discuss and explore what types of external interventions enhance or hinder the objectives and the security of the peaceful movements, when and how should the peacebuilding community engage with peaceful protest movements and, in doing so, more effectively support nonviolence.

To attend this event, please register here.

Author

No authors assigned to this post.

References

Related articles

“Security is more than just military strength”: Catholic Responses to Armament and Crisis

The Katholikentag in Würzburg has shown that peace, security and development go hand in hand. In this interview, Dorothee Klüppel, a member of FriEnt’s Steering Committee and Head of the Africa/Middle East Department at Misereor, explains why security is more than just military strength, why justice, democracy and international cooperation are key prerequisites for sustainable peace and what special role church actors play in this – particularly in times of rearmament and geopolitical tensions.

The Humanitarian-Development-Peace Nexus at a Turning Point

How can the Humanitarian-Development-Peace (HDP) nexus effectively deliver on its promises amid mounting crises, shrinking resources and rising political tension? Lena Pönisch, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), shares the key findings of an international reflection process and explains why, today more than ever, better political, institutional and financial frameworks are needed to achieve joint impact in crisis contexts.

From Ambition to Inaction: Climate Talks Struggle to Deliver Implementation

The intersessional climate negotiations (SB64) in Bonn concluded with sobering results. Climate justice was a central theme in many discussions and rounds of negotiations, but issues surrounding climate finance prevented an agreement from being reached. Negotiations on the global adaptation target, for example, must start again from scratch. The nexus of climate, peace and security was largely overlooked in the negotiations, as well as in the action agenda presented by the Turkish COP31 Presidency.

Building Peace in a Changing Climate: An Indigenous Perspective from Bangladesh

At the June Climate Meetings of the UNFCCC Subsidiary Bodies (SB64) in Bonn, Mrinal Kanti Tripura, Director of the Maleya Foundation in Bangladesh, shared his perspective on how climate change is affecting Indigenous Peoples in the Eastern Himalayan region. In this interview, he explains why climate impacts threaten not only livelihoods but also culture and traditional knowledge, and why Indigenous voices must be heard in climate negotiations.

Related articles