What are you looking for?

News

Integrating the peace pillar into the HDP nexus

Humanitarian, development & peace actors can work together more effectively
Brett Jordan | Unsplash

Complex crises require integrated solutions. The Humanitarian-Development-Peace (HDP) nexus aims to connect humanitarian, development, and peace work. However, the “peace pillar” often remains underutilised. Berghof Foundation’s experiences show that strengthening local conflict sensitivity (“small p”) while strategically linking to broader peace initiatives (“Big P”) enhances social cohesion, supports local ownership, and maximizes long-term impact. Partnerships between humanitarian, development, and peace actors are key to ensuring that peace efforts are effectively embedded into programmes on the ground.

Despite progress, challenges remain. In the nexus debate, a distinction is made between “small p” peace – including conflict sensitivity, social cohesion, and local peacebuilding – and “Big P” peace, which includes more politically sensitive peace support programming such as mediation support, support for peace negotioations and security sector reform. Berghof’s work highlights that leveraging this complementarity also means recognising that some of the most significant peacebuilding impacts can be achieved at the meso level. That is below sometimes blocked and politicised national-level peace processes, but above community level programming – where gains in social cohesion, for instance, can fall prey to renewed escalation linked to higher-level dynamics.

Better connecting such work to development and humanitarian interventions by coordinating programmes around a strategic focus on peace in conflict-affected contexts can strengthen the nexus programming. This can help conflict parties and local communities turn agreements on contentious issues into tangible outcomes.

Further information can be found on the Berghof Foundation website here.

References
Share
Author
Get in touch
Do you have questions about this article, or would you like to contact the FriEnt team?

Related articles

[tag_names_card]

“A conflict is not forgotten, because the headlines move on”

At FriEnt’s latest Forgotten Conflicts series discussion, held on 26 August in Berlin, experts and practitioners from Nigeria and Germany explored the drivers and consequences of violence in the country’s Northwest and Middle Belt. The discussion challenged narratives that portray the violence primarily as a religious conflict and highlighted the need to address climate stress, land scarcity, governance gaps and the erosion of livelihoods, while strengthening locally rooted approaches to peacebuilding.
[tag_names_card]

“Security is more than just military strength”: Catholic Responses to Armament and Crisis

The Katholikentag in Würzburg has shown that peace, security and development go hand in hand. In this interview, Dorothee Klüppel, a member of FriEnt’s Steering Committee and Head of the Africa/Middle East Department at Misereor, explains why security is more than just military strength, why justice, democracy and international cooperation are key prerequisites for sustainable peace and what special role church actors play in this – particularly in times of rearmament and geopolitical tensions.
[tag_names_card]

The Humanitarian-Development-Peace Nexus at a Turning Point

How can the Humanitarian-Development-Peace (HDP) nexus effectively deliver on its promises amid mounting crises, shrinking resources and rising political tension? Lena Pönisch, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), shares the key findings of an international reflection process and explains why, today more than ever, better political, institutional and financial frameworks are needed to achieve joint impact in crisis contexts.
[tag_names_card]

From Ambition to Inaction: Climate Talks Struggle to Deliver Implementation

The intersessional climate negotiations (SB64) in Bonn concluded with sobering results. Climate justice was a central theme in many discussions and rounds of negotiations, but issues surrounding climate finance prevented an agreement from being reached. Negotiations on the global adaptation target, for example, must start again from scratch. The nexus of climate, peace and security was largely overlooked in the negotiations, as well as in the action agenda presented by the Turkish COP31 Presidency.

Related articles