Wonach suchen Sie?

Wonach suchen Sie?

Breaking the vicious cycle

Entry points for anticorruption in inclusive peace processes. A new publication of Berghof Foundation
Berghof Foundation
Konfliktsensibilität
Treppenhaus | grillot-edouard-uX4ikaLXYtE | Unsplash

Corruption and violent conflict are interlinked in deep and complex ways. This
U4 Issue considers how corruption as an element of conflict systems could be
addressed during peace processes and how peacebuilders can support political
efforts to curb corruption and promote accountability during transitions from
war to peace. Now is the time to bridge the contributions of peacebuilding and
anti-corruption practitioners in the quest for a sustainable transformation
process.

The authors of the publication emphasise the following main points

  • Approaches towards conflict transformation should be informed by a
    nuanced understanding of the political economy of violent conflict and
    corruption. Corruption as an element of conflict systems should be
    addressed during peace processes to support political efforts to curb
    corruption and promote accountability during the transition toward peace.
  • Although it is rarely possible to eradicate corruption, ignoring it during
    peace processes is not a viable option. Rather, peacebuilders should identify
    ways to reduce corruption’s long-term impact on the inclusivity and
    sustainability of peace process. Such pragmatic approaches should prioritise
    the aspects of corruption that matter most for state legitimacy, trust between
    communities, and trust in institutions.
  • National and international actors should promote inclusivity and
    accountability during negotiations and bargaining over political settlements
    and should not wait for ‘post-conflict’ governance programmes.
  • A systemic approach to integrating corruption and violent conflict can
    highlight the multidimensional and multi-directional linkages and feedback
    loops that inform complex social phenomena such as patronage, point to the
    relevance of social norms and other factors defining the system, and caution
    against technical fixes.
  • Addressing corrupt behaviour in conflict contexts requires a high level of
    political support, resources, and technical expertise. It also requires
    introspection, learning, and space for confidential and constructive dialogue
    among anti-corruption and peacebuilding communities to chart this difficult
    terrain.
  • Efforts towards transparency and integrity as well as conflict transformation
    share important foundations, namely a transformative agenda rooted in
    social justice as well as a conceptual focus on local agency and
    empowerment.
Autor
Dr. Ulrike Hopp-Nishanka

Dr. Ulrike Hopp-Nishanka has been working on conflict transformation and peacebuilding for 20 years as practitioner, researcher, lecturer as well as Deputy Head of Division at Germany’s Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), most recently focusing on inclusive peacebuilding, recovery and reconstruction in the MENA region as well as Afghanistan. From 2005 to 2012, Ulrike was Deputy Director of the Sri Lanka Project of the Berghof Foundation and supported the Mediation and Peace Infrastructure Programme. Ulrike helped shape the concept of Infrastructures for Peace and holds a Ph.D. from the University of Hamburg, investigating the role of the peace secretariats in Sri Lanka’s peace process and their contribution to conflict transformation. During the time of writing, Ulrike was on leave from BMZ and consulting for a variety of aid agencies and peacebuilding actors with a focus on the political economy of reconstruction and peacebuilding as well as inclusive peace processes. Since October 2021, she is part of BMZ's Afghanistan team again.

Joshua Rogers

Joshua Rogers is a Senior Project Manager working on the Berghof Foundation’s political dialogue work in Yemen and on Yemen in the Gulf region. He advises on strengthening inclusive local governance in Yemen and leads Berghof’s efforts to integrate thinking about corruption into peace processes and political dialogue efforts. He can be contacted via this link.

Referenzen

Verwandte Artikel

Der Katholikentag in Würzburg hat gezeigt: Frieden, Sicherheit und Entwicklung gehören zusammen. Im Gespräch erläutert Dorothee Klüppel, Mitglied im Lenkungsausschuss von FriEnt und Abteilungsleiterin Afrika/Nahost bei Misereor, warum Sicherheit mehr ist als militärische Stärke, weshalb Gerechtigkeit, Demokratie und internationale Zusammenarbeit zentrale Voraussetzungen für nachhaltigen Frieden sind und welche besondere Rolle kirchliche Akteure dabei spielen – gerade in Zeiten von Aufrüstung und geopolitischen Spannungen.
Wie kann der Humanitarian-Development-Peace (HDP) Nexus angesichts wachsender Krisen, knapper Ressourcen und geopolitischer Spannungen wirksam umgesetzt werden? Lena Pönisch von der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) stellt die zentralen Erkenntnisse eines internationalen Reflexionsprozesses vor und zeigt, warum es heute vor allem bessere politische, institutionelle und finanzielle Rahmenbedingungen braucht, um gemeinsame Wirkung in Krisenkontexten zu erzielen.
Die Klimazwischenverhandlungen (SB64) in Bonn endeten mit ernüchternden Ergebnissen. Klimagerechtigkeit war in vielen Gesprächen und Verhandlungsrunden ein zentrales Thema, doch Fragen rund um die Klimafinanzierung verhinderten eine Einigung. Die Verhandlungen über das globale Anpassungsziel müssen beispielsweise wieder bei null beginnen. Der Nexus von Klima, Frieden und Sicherheit blieb in den Verhandlungen sowie in der von der türkischen COP31-Präsidentschaft vorgestellten Aktionsagenda weitgehend unberücksichtigt.
Im Rahmen der UN-Klimaverhandlungen, den sogenannten June Climate Meetings der Nebenorgane der UNFCCC (SB64) in Bonn, schilderte Mrinal Kanti Tripura, Direktor der Maleya Foundation in Bangladesch, wie sich der Klimawandel auf indigene Personen im östlichen Himalaya auswirkt. Im Interview erläutert er, warum die Folgen des Klimawandels nicht nur Lebensgrundlagen, sondern auch Kultur und traditionelles Wissen bedrohen – und warum die Stimmen indigener Gemeinschaften in den Klimaverhandlungen Gehör finden müssen.

Verwandte Artikel